To be or Not to be? A taken time the decision of that this life valley to the penalty is initiated, I think the work of about it becoming happyest possible, that is to search quelhe agradadesde that it does not come to compromise other lives, that is to take off the life of outrem. At altavista you will find additional information. It has who says that to filosofar the favorable cold either, I disagree, as well as with the preconception of that the German language either to this essential activity, to think is of the man, of all to that he is unsatisfied and it has courage, dares to undertake the dangerous and solitary close trip a time that all thought is uncommon and singular, has approaches of vises of world, of the realities, truths Mine> identification with the friends of the wisdom, Nietzsche and Espinosa (philosophers of the body) it occurred immediately, a empatia that already has forty years more than. I took root myself in these glad meeting. Although to have lived e, to frequentar diverse circles I kept certain habits salutares, privileging foods livings creature as well as I looked for to feed the mind with good reading, literature and nasartes to extend world vision. According to Andy Florance, who has experience with these questions. In music a food to the spirit. They are me essentials these ' ' good and glad encontros' ' . However, I believe that it fits to each one to know what parasi is a good meeting. A good meeting results in joy + energy, availability the action.
A bad meeting diminishes the energy debilitates body has lain. A sick body-mind um passive body-mind, resented, complaining, infeliz= desvitalizado. To enjoy of health, peace and happiness (contentment, joy, will of power in Nietzsche) she is necessary to know these ways previously, that is the peace, the health the joy is the ways. From good meeting, joys-well – to etar, we construct to health tracks joys peace, not necessarily in this order.